Perverted Nehruvian progenies on Vote Politics

Wednesday, July 11, 2012

Black Sheep of Indian Journlism Exposed

Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Subramanian Swamy accuses Cong of belittling Mamata - Indian Express

Nitish Kumar and Sharad Yadav both are quite qualified to join Nehruvian Congress.

These both leaders have no principles. They have come to lime light during the agitation launched by Jai Prakash Narayan in 1974. Indira Gandhi imposed emergency and she killed all the human rights and constitutional rights of people of India. But since Indira Gandhi was a woman of ordinary calibre she was weak in administration and foresight. Emergency failed. She had to declare election under her own imposed censorship where the media had surrendered Indira.

But Jai Prakash was Mahatma Gandhian had excellent moral courage. He mobilized people. Now these two fellow and many others like Mamata, Laloo and Mulayam came to lime light under the leadership of Jai Prakash Narayan and Morarji Desai. Now you see, the party that had sent them (Sharad, Nitish, Laloo, Mulayam, etc ) to jail without prosecution and without existence of offence on their part, they are supporting its candidate viz Pranav Mukharji who is a criminal culprit on the government record. Where is the principle?

Thursday, May 31, 2012

BJP rebels up in arms against Narendra Modi

If the rule under the leadership of Narendra Modi is like emergency as stated by Keshu and its allies, then people must understand that though Keshubhai was quite a grown up fellow in 1975-1976, his sense was comparable with a baby with perambulator. Every body knows very well that during emergency natural rights and human rights were withdrawn, Indira had confessed that her government had failed in all respect, Indira had imposed total censorship and all her opponents were behind bar with no existence of any offence. Here the case and situation is quite opposite. In case of Narendra Modi, the success in developments is in every field, even then there is liberty to every one and media, and thereby all the media lavishly writes against Modi, Keshu and all anti-Modi-s abuse Modi continuously without material. In fact Keshu and his allies are lacking in sense of significance and sense of logic.
BJP rebels up in arms against Narendra Modi

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

http://www.sunday-guardian.com/analysis/nehruvians-unite-against-modi

http://www.sunday-guardian.com/analysis/nehruvians-unite-against-modi
It is needless to say that Nehruvians, Nehruvian Congress party leaders and their allies are like foxes of a story of Puncha Tantra, where all the Foxes had organised a meet and initiated thinking on the line as to how to kill Karpurtilaka (an elephant). They were planning that anyhow, he should be killed. Recall that story.
Here the foxes are failing every time, even though they take help from other Elephant (Keshubhai Patel, Suresh Mehta etc...) and all donkeys, monkeys, dogs, rats, ants, frogs, (i.e. leaders of other castes and media).

Monday, March 26, 2012

300 Ramayanas, one Rama - Indian Express

It is not a fault of Rama who walked on this earth in flesh and blood, if some people took him as a character of fiction or myth.

It is not a fault of Rama who walked on this earth if some people take him as a God.

There may be and there could be 300 or even more texts on life of Rama. So what do you mean by that?

How many books have been written on MK Gandhi? It may run in tens of thousands with different angles. They may contradict also. Does this make him non-entity? Why there should be any structure for him? Why Narendra Modi has constructed “Mahatma Mandir”?

How much it matters to a common mass? Why such questions are not raised?

This is simply because you have imported the historical beliefs from the people who were not born and brought up in India and wanted to divide India on fake theories of invasion. Even if you leave this aside, there is no tradition anywhere in the world to worship a fictitious character. But there is a practice to worship an entity which may be a human or natural (Entity) howsoever it may exists or existed.

Now suppose some people if carry a belief that MK Gandhi was God. Does this make MK Gandhi a non-entity? God is every where. So what? This applies to every religion. Why should this be applied exclusively to Rama only?

Style of presentation in literature differs time to time. India had its own style to narrate life of kings and great people. Ancient India had its own style to write history to make it interesting. It had added some miracles. Leave aside miracles.

Even to day media makes tigers of a dynasty progeny. It is up to the generations to identify the size of a dynastical progeny.

The great size of Rama has been identified and recognised. Learned people must have the sense of honouring the values recognised under a long traditional belief by a culture which has re-produced or derived “Adwait”.